Likes

• Jess Robinson

Other Mentions

• Piers Cawley

  When last we left off we had worked out how to grab all the mentions of this site that Webmentions.io knew about and now we want to write that out to the data/ directory in a format that’s easy to deal with in Hugo.

  If you’ve read my earlier note, you’ll know that I’ve been evolving the data schema towards something that’s easy for Hugo to deal with and reasonably comprehensible for me too.

  As things currently stand, I’ve settled on dropping all the mentions in a single file, data/mentions/all.json

  I’d rather use data/mentions.json, but Hugo’s data system doesn’t seem to pick that up, so I’ll live with the slightly more clunky option.

  which is structured along these lines:

  {
    "/note/7/": {
      "like-of": [
        {
          "type": "entry",
          "author": {
            "type": "card",
            "name": "Daniel Kelly Music",
            "photo": "https://avatars.webmention.io/fsn1.your-objectstorage.com/7aa4815cbc1f993c0e2a6df03280dc168f5ad07fecd0313ddfc27eeb02e0b437.png",
            "url": "https://aus.social/@yasslad"
          },
          "url": "https://mendeddrum.org/@pdcawley/115160370354067277#favorited-by-109307830089461078",
          "published": null,
          "wm-received": "2025-09-07T01:31:46Z",
          "wm-id": 1936817,
          "wm-source": "https://brid.gy/like/mastodon/@pdcawley@mendeddrum.org/115160370354067277/109307830089461078",
          "wm-target": "https://bofh.org.uk/note/7/",
          "wm-protocol": "webmention",
          "like-of": "https://bofh.org.uk/note/7/",
          "wm-property": "like-of",
          "wm-private": false
        },
        {
          "type": "entry",
          "author": {
            "type": "card",
            "name": "Jess Robinson",
            "photo": "https://avatars.webmention.io/fsn1.your-objectstorage.com/a11ee0a58e54873140bf1f1965900378d866fce3fafae79e116b979bea3a8773.jpg",
            "url": "https://fosstodon.org/@castaway"
          },
          "url": "https://mendeddrum.org/@pdcawley/115160370354067277#favorited-by-109562941096076318",
          "published": null,
          "wm-received": "2025-09-07T07:19:01Z",
          "wm-id": 1936873,
          "wm-source": "https://brid.gy/like/mastodon/@pdcawley@mendeddrum.org/115160370354067277/109562941096076318",
          "wm-target": "https://bofh.org.uk/note/7/",
          "wm-protocol": "webmention",
          "like-of": "https://bofh.org.uk/note/7/",
          "wm-property": "like-of",
          "wm-private": false
        }
      ],
      "in-reply-to": [],
      "mention-of": [],
      "repost-of": [],
      "other": []
    }
  }
  

  Just imagine that JSON object has a bunch more paths as keys referencing similar objects keyed by mention type.

  As it stands, wm--fetch-all is returning a flat sequence of webmention objects that we want to process into a more structured object,

  JSON/Javascript calls them objects, old Perl heads like me think of them as hashes, and they’re “Hash Tables” in Emacs Lisp. I’ll be calling them hashes from now on.

  in other words we want to fold (or “reduce” in Emacs Lisp terminology) the sequence into a hash. And I know just the function for that. Let’s see what describe-function has to say about seq-reduce:

  seq-reduce is a byte-compiled function defined in seq.el.gz.
  
  *Signature*
  (seq-reduce FUNCTION SEQUENCE INITIAL-VALUE)
  
  *Documentation*
  
  Reduce the function FUNCTION across SEQUENCE, starting
  with INITIAL-VALUE.
  
  Return the result of calling FUNCTION with INITIAL-VALUE
  and the first element of SEQUENCE, then calling FUNCTION
  with that result and the second element of SEQUENCE,
  then with that result and the third element of SEQUENCE,
  etc. FUNCTION will be called with INITIAL-VALUE (and then
  the accumulated value) as the first argument, and the
  elements from SEQUENCE as the second argument.
  
  If SEQUENCE is empty, return INITIAL-VALUE and FUNCTION
  is not called.
  
  This does not modify SEQUENCE.
  

  So we can write

  (seq-reduce #'wm--add-mention-to-hash-table
              (wm--fetch-all)
              (make-hash-table :test 'equal))
  

  and that will handle the business of iterating over the sequence of mentions for us, and all we have to do is write wm--add-mention-to-hash-table to populate the hash we made with (make-hash-table :test 'equal)

  We need to use that :test ’equal part because json-insert wants a hash with strings as keys and the default hash returned by (make-hash-table) compares keys using eql which might or might not work when comparing strings. Not a problem which equal has.

  one mention at a time, and return the modified hash (You and I both know that it’s the same old hash mutated, but let’s pretend it isn’t, eh?).

  What does that function look like? Here’s what I wrote:

  (defun wm--add-mention-to-hash-table (acc mention)
    "Helps reduce a list of mentions into a two level hash."
    (require 'dash)
    (let* ((path (--> mention
                      (gethash "wm-target" it)
                      (url-generic-parse-url it)
                      (url-path-and-query it)
                      (car it)))
           (mentions-hash (or (gethash path acc nil)
                              (wm-new-mentions-hash)))
           (mention-type (gethash "wm-property" mention))
           (mentions (or (gethash mention-type mentions-hash)
                         (progn
                           (setq mention-type "other")
                           (gethash mention-type mentions-hash))))
           (new-mentions (if (seq-contains mentions mention)
                             mentions
                           (vconcat mentions (list mention)))))
      (puthash mention-type new-mentions mentions-hash)
      (puthash path mentions-hash acc)
      acc))
  

  We grab the path from the "wm-target" key, which is actually a URL rather than a simple path

  We could just use the URL, and that would work fine on this site, but not when I’m running on localhost. The path will always match with .RelPermalink, but the host part of .Permalink is different in development than in production.

  so, rather than writing

  (car
   (url-path-and-query
    (url-generic-parse-url
     (gethash "wm-target" mention))))
  

  we’ll thread mention through that series of transformations using dash.el’s threading macro, -->.

  We use the path to grab mentions-hash from the acc-umulating hash and, if there isn’t already one there, we grab an empty, but structured hash using wm-new-mentions-hash, which looks like this:

  (defun wm-new-mentions-hash ()
    "Make a new empty hash to hold categorised webmention data."
    (copy-hash-table
     #s(hash-table
        test equal
        data ("like-of" [] "in-reply-to" []
              "mention-of" [] "repost-of" []
              "other" []))))
  

  Now we look up "wm-property" in mention, and use that to grab its associated vector of mentions. Well, we would, but there’s a small wrinkle.

  We’re only currently interested in four kinds of mention, but Webmention.io doesn’t know that. We could throw the extras away, but what if we became interested in bookmark-of mentions or whatever somewhere down the road. So let’s collect them under the other key. Which is where this hacky section of our let* form comes in:

  (mention-type
   (gethash "wm-property" mention))
  (mentions
   (or (gethash mention-type mentions-hash)
       (progn
         (setq mention-type "other")
         (gethash mention-type mentions-hash))))
  

  What’s going on here then?

  First, we make a guess at the mention-type we’re going to file the current mention under by grabbing the "wm-property" and use that value to lookup the mention type in mentions-hash. If it’s one of the four types we’re interested in, that will be a vector, which is truth-y, otherwise we get nil, which is false-y so we change the mention type to “other” and grab that vector from the mention hash.

  We now know the key path we’re going to store our mentions in, and we have the current vector of mentions associated with it. So, if we already know (seq-contains mentions mention) about the current mention, we reuse that, otherwise we make a new vector with the current mention added to it.

  That done, it’s a simple matter of putting the new mentions vector into our mentions hash, putting the mentions hash into our accumulating hash and returning that.

  With that done, it’s a simple matter of opening data/mentions/all.json, erasing the buffer, calling (json-insert (seq-reduce ...)) to update the data and saving it. Here’s the code which does exactly that.

  (defun wm-unflatten-mentions (mentions-vec)
    (seq-reduce 'wm--add-mention-to-hash-table mentions-vec
                (make-hash-table :test 'equal)))
  
  (defun wm-fetch-mentions ()
    "Fetch the webmentions of `wm-domain'."
    (interactive)
    (save-current-buffer
      (let ((all-entries (wm--fetch-all)))
        (with-temp-file (expand-file-name "all.json" wm-data-dir)
          (erase-buffer)
          (json-insert (wm-unflatten-mentions all-entries))))))
  

  Over in the Hugo partial that renders the bit of the page immediately after this, we can get at the data like this:

  {{- $all_mentions := index site.Data.mentions.all .RelPermalink  -}}
  {{ $likes := index $all_mentions "like-of" | default slice -}}
  {{ $reposts := index $all_mentions "repost-of" | default slice -}}
  {{ $replies := index $all_mentions "in-reply-to" | default slice -}}
  {{ $mentions := index $all_mentions "mention-of" | default slice -}}
  <footer class="metaline">
    <ul class="response-summary">
      <li>{{ $likes | len }} {{ if eq 1 (len $likes) }}like{{ else }}likes{{ end }}</li>
      <li>{{ $reposts | len }} {{ if eq 1 (len $reposts) }}repost{{ else }}reposts{{ end }}</li>
      <li>{{ $replies | len }} {{ if eq 1 (len $replies) }}reply{{ else }}replies{{ end }}</li>
      <li>{{ $mentions | len }} {{ if eq 1 (len $mentions) }}mention{{ else }}mentions{{ end }}</li>
    </ul>
  </footer>
  ...
  

  I’ll leave the rest as an exercise for the interested reader. However, I will note that the Webmention.io API includes the option to pass in a since argument, so it wouldn’t be hard to write

  (seq-reduce
   'wm--add-mention-to-hash-table
   (wm-fetch-mentions-since wm-last-checked)
   (wm-parse-mentions-file
    (expand-file-name "mentions/all.json"
                      wm-data-dir)))
  

  without having to change our reducing function at all.

  Separation of concerns, baby! Separation of concerns!

  Tue, 9nd Sep, 2025 8:49pm +0000