Certification and Standards
Written by Piers Cawley on , updated
One of the less satisfying sessions/panels at OSCON this year was the ‘Perl Certification’ Panel, in which a panel of various luminaries, moderated by Tim Maher of the Seattle Perl Users’ Group spoke inconclusively about whether there was a need for Perl Certification. It seems to me that, if you’re going to have a panel on this kind of topic, you must make sure that your moderator is impartial (but not disinterested). Tim Maher, for all his many virtues, was not impartial.
One of the less satisfying sessions/panels at OSCON this year was the ‘Perl Certification’ Panel, in which a panel of various luminaries, moderated by Tim Maher of the Seattle Perl Users’ Group spoke inconclusively about whether there was a need for Perl Certification. It seems to me that, if you’re going to have a panel on this kind of topic, you must make sure that your moderator is impartial (but not disinterested). Tim Maher, for all his many virtues, was not impartial.
I arrived late to the panel, so I could be forming a bad impression, but it seemed to me the panel had the cart before the horse, and any similar panel will also have such an ungainly configuration, and here’s why: